After Running Kontera’s Content Links…
I guess I’m switching back to intelliTXT come June 1. I’ve been running Kontera’s content links since the middle of the month and while the experience has been much better than a year ago, performance is still not close to that of intelliTXT. In fact, it’s about half and that’s with a significantly larger percentage share by Kontera. It is somewhat disappointing and probably cost me money this month but without doing it I wouldn’t really be able to judge the differences. Both services from a publishers perspective work the same. The adcode is similar and implemented the same with both systems. Each has the ability to target certain areas and exclude certain areas. On the back end however, it’s my understanding they are very different with the biggest difference being how each system targets keywords.
It’s been interesting seeing how the two companies dealt with me the publisher and the situation. I can’t complain about either as I fully expected intelliTXT to drop me but that didn’t happen and I’m not saying I won’t use Kontera in the future, nor am I suggesting they aren’t a viable advertising resource. I do think however, they still have a bit of catching up to do as I saw a number of adlinks that simply said “loading” never pulling in any kind of ad. Much of that I think was due to the fact my sites are forums where lots of pages seemed to get overlooked, but on the blogs targeting seemed to be pretty good.
The goal of this test was two fold. For them it was to gain another publisher and for me to make more money. My loyalties lie with the service that’s going to pay me the most money, plain and simple without me having to worry about it. I ran intelliTXT for 12 and half days in May and ran Kontera for the remainder of the month, on the same sites, in the same manner. There’s still one day of stats to collect but I see no reason to think it will change much.
Kontera: 288,812 impressions - 1,268 clicks = $120.59 (5/13 to 5/30)
IntelliTXT: 234,519 impressions - 2,641 clicks = $328.49 (5/1 to 5/13)
If your only gauge is who generates the most money then I think it’s pretty clear. Going into this I made it clear I expected a certain CPC level because from day 1 with intelliTXT it’s been rock solid, much like Adsense and there was the expectation that it would take 8-10 days to get there as the Kontera system “learned” how to target keywords on my sites. I was fine with that because the expectation was in the end more money. That’s failed to materialize and only one day actually surpassed the CPC expectation, most of the rest fell way short. The CTR was also about half what intelliTXT was. Why this is I’m not real sure, but I’d guess it has a great deal to do with a particular niche and the ad inventory each vendor has for that niche. In my case, the bulk of my traffic related to celebrity/music and intelliTXT definitely seemed to cover that better. If I had a high traffic site in a completely different niche I’d certainly try it out to see if there was indeed a noticeable difference but I don’t have one and I don’t like spending a lot of time working on a system. Either it works or it doesn’t and for me Kontera still doesn’t. Had I not already been privy to intelliTXT I can say I would have been very impressed with the progression Kontera has made over the past year. That said, for me, it’s about making money and at this point in time, it’s in my best interests to stay with intelliTXT, at least for my entertainment related ventures.
Something I think they need to work on that will improve the system is targeting. I was not at all impressed with it and the fact it has to take so long to “learn” what to target I think is a problem. Even 8-10 days is too long and truth be told, that could pose a problem for any forum because the nature of the content is so fluid the rules would constantly be changing from post to post. This is less of a problem on a blog or static site so I can see how a forum could fair less with this system vs. the other one.
Overall I’d have to say that compared to other systems I’ve used, Kontera is definitely a viable resource for any site owner. I think intelliTXT is so rigid with their requirements to get into the program because they know their system just works. For me, it’s like comparing Adsense to YPN, they’re sort of close but not really. If your a smaller publisher and can take advantage of some of the offerings that are floating around to get into the Kontera program, I highly recommend trying it out. Like I said, I think with them especially, a lot of it has to do with niches and inventories and over time they will most likely equalize.
If I were to give intelliTXT an A, I’d have to give Kontera a B maybe a B+. The rep I worked with was cool about everything and they really tried. In fact, he’s still trying and Kontera has some cool things in the pipeline that I may check out in the not too distance future.

