All Posts Tagged With: "digg"

Social Networks: Digg Sucks & StumbleUpon Rules Them All

If you run a website then one of the most important and frustrating things you have to deal with is how and where to get traffic. If your a new site this can be overwhelmingly frustrating and many people (myself included) have sought to get that golden article that lands on the frontpage of Digg. Over the past month I’ve had a couple posts get noticed, nothing that sent earth shattering or server exploding traffic my way but enough that can be measured. The results are more than a little interesting.

I got brushed by Digg around Sept 4th, again nothing too mind shocking but enough to register a nice little spike. The effect lasted for about 24 hours, right up to the point the post got buried (as it was starting to gain some good momentum no less).

Initially the article started off on Reddit and that provided a nice little spike, again, nothing major but enough it caught the attention of a digger. The effect was the same, very short lived. In fact, several articles submitted to Reddit resulted in subsequent traffic spikes, all showing similar results, very sharp spikes that trailed off quickly. Not nearly as quickly as Digg, but nothing super sustainable either.

Another article posted around the same timeframe got Stumbled and it went crazy (for me anyway). The interesting thing was that while it showed the same sharp increase in traffic it took it way longer to die off than either of the other two networks, maintaining traffic for nearly two weeks. In fact, I have a couple articles that got Stumbled more than 6 months ago that still send regular traffic.

I’m not the only one that has noted this either, Shoemoney noted similar patterns with both Digg & Fark as compared to StumbleUpon. Shoemoney notes the differences in terms of time on site, suggesting that contrary to popular belief Stumblers tend to hang around longer than most people believe. Looking at my own numbers, they aren’t as dramatic but seem to coincide with what Shoemoney saw. StumbleUpon had an exit rate of 54.31% while Digg was right there at 54.19% but Reddit didn’t hang around long at all with an exit rate of 87.73%.

What’s all this mean? Well, to me it means that Digg is overrated and Stumblers ROCK! Digg traffic is purely “in the moment” traffic and while it may bring you new reader it’s not sustainable after the initial shock wave. StumbleUpon is, in my opinion, the best of the major Social Networks. It’s easy to use, doesn’t arbitrarily kill submissions because of some predisposed prejudice and the members really make it a community. Unlike Digg who rules with an iron fist and gives power diggers the power to totally kill something based on their own bias. Power Stumblers certainly have the ability to command major amounts of traffic but Stumblers seem to be more concerned about things of interest to them or things they feel will be of interest to others (that’s the big difference) where Digg appears to be a “members only” club, where if your not part of the “in” crowd, you have little hope of ever being invited to dance. It? also doesn’t really matter that something you have might be of interest to a large number of Diggers, if it’s not of interest to the main stream it’s dead.

If your looking for decent traffic, then getting involved in StumbleUpon is a key thing you should be doing. Aside from the potential of major traffic if Stumblers like your stuff, just participating will turn you on to some pretty cool sites and individuals. You can tag me on StumbleUpon via crazy4bass.stumbleupon.com, drop me a note or add me as a friend.

How To Get Screwed By The Digg Gods

digg.jpg

Everybody knows the reputation Digg has for banning sites. A quick search in Google for the term “banned by Digg” gives you tons of people that have been castrated by the Internet demi-gods. Much like Adsense bannings, everybody is innocent and did no wrong, whether that’s true or not is a highly debated topic. What follows is a whimsical look at some of the reasons that have been claimed will get your license to use a golden shovel revoked.

  1. You made multiple profiles and submitted irrelevant or spammy articles then Dugg them yourself.
    I mean really, how stupid can you be? There’s nothing more dangerous than a savy “IT” person.
  2. Your a MySpacer and figured if you added a ton of friends quickly to build up your profile the quicker you could begin spamming them.
    It works for MySpace right? Digg is a social network right? And your really are that stupid aren’t you?
  3. You posted something so controversial that Digg is forced to pull the article breaking every known commandment they’ve ever set, resulting in such backlash from the community that Digg actually takes itself down.
    Can you say HD-DVD Key, just don’t say it too loud.
  4. Have a popular site that generates a lot of generic Diggs.
    It sucks to be popular don’t it?
  5. You submitted a story then had a bunch of buddies at work all register and Digg the same story from behind the same firewall.
    Hey look, it’s the “IT” guy from earlier.
  6. Trying to Game Digg
    Trust me, your not that smart.
  7. Write something that bashes Digg
    There’s no better way to show your disgust for being banned than calling out the people that banned you and taking them to the mat. What do you think this is a Democracy?
  8. Submit something about SEO
    Who the frak cares about SEO anyway, all you need is to get on Digg’s frontpage.
  9. Keep submitting duplicate stories
    I know, I know. If you keep doing it they’ll eventually tire of it an just Digg it to get you to go away. That’s pretty smart thinking.
  10. Write a post about getting banned from Digg.
    Supposedly, simply writing a post about getting banned from Digg will get you banned form Digg. Buh bye.
  11. Digg too fast
    Yes I know, your a speed reader and you have a 14.4GigaWatt internet connection in which you an read and Digg 17.347 unique pages a second.
  12. Forget to pay your Digg dues.
    Seriously! Didn’t you know the secret to getting on Diggs frontpage was a membership thing and as long as you paid your dues it was automatic. Geesh, and I thought you were internet savvy.
  13. Submit something that’s worthwhile and actually is worthy of the Digg gods and have it make the frontpage.
    That’s right. When you finally decide to go legit and you play by the rules and all that jazz, when the day comes that you’re finally able to sneak your own post in the mix or someone else does for you, your site gets taken offline for days. Welcome to Digg folks, enjoy the ride.

Again, just some Friday afternoon humor at the expense of the Digg gods. I can’t vouch for the authenticity of these reasons for getting banned from Digg, but if you choose to ignore them you might want to keep an eye on your jewels.

If you really want to make my weekend, help me get banned from Digg by pushing this to the frontpage. (We’ll call it testing #10).

Are You On The Digg Super Secret Autobury Blacklist?

Paula Mooney has put together another great piece this week that investigates the little known but often speculated on super secret internal autobury feature that’s been imposed by Digg. Digg is the social content website that is a favorite among bloggers. Having one of your stories make it to the frontpage of Digg could mean tens of thousands of visitors over a short amount of time and in some cases that could literally launch a blog into major action.

However, as with any service that provides either money or traffic it will be manipulated. What defines manipulation is a discussion that will never have an equalizing answer outside of the internal organization. On their site Digg makes this statement about itself.

Digg is a user driven social content website. Ok, so what the heck does that mean? Well, everything on Digg is submitted by our community (that would be you). After you submit content, other people read your submission and Digg what they like best. If your story rocks and receives enough Diggs, it is promoted to the front page for the millions of visitors to see.

The founder and chief architect Kevin Rose is known for his continued mantra that Digg is driven by the users but the recent HD-DVD Hack Key fiasco proved that wasn’t the case. Now Paula along with a few others has uncovered plausible evidence that the Digg algorithms autobury content submitted by both flagged domains and flagged user accounts. She also posts some credible sources and evidence to back up the theory. I won’t regurgitate her findings, I’ll let those speak for themselves and you can check them out here, but I’ll offer this thought on the whole Digg discussion.

Something I didn’t see posted that I’ve thought for a long time is the Digg algorithms have the ability to learn the patterns of it’s users. By analyzing the urls that users submit then crawling those they are somehow able to piece together domains that are used by a common account. (ie: all the self submitters). Since this practice is heavily frowned upon but practiced by virtually everyone, it wouldn’t be too difficult for some math geniuses to piece the data together to form a pattern with common attribute. Now, my theory is purely speculation and I’ve not done nor do I intend to do the research that Paula has put into her post in an attempt to prove it or disprove it. I think anyone that uses Digg understands what’s happening and the backlash for a couple of weeks ago was only the beginning of the end for the service.

If you agree with this then Digg this post, then head over to Paula’s site and read her post, she’ll show you how to check to see if your on the super secret autobury blacklist. Once your done, make sure you Digg her post too. Thanks for reading.